<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed changes to Postscripts &#8211; from magazine to quarterly anthology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/</link>
	<description>The latest news and updates from UK independent genre publisher PS Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.P.Rubies</title>
		<link>http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>J.P.Rubies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>I may be alone here, but I like the 2-columns amd and have been enjoying the current format a great deal. I also do not think that I could afford the hardcover price. And what is the advantage of not calling it a magazine? So my suggestion is to let things stay as they are.  Do you need to do the monster issues? Surely you can avoid them at no cost!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be alone here, but I like the 2-columns amd and have been enjoying the current format a great deal. I also do not think that I could afford the hardcover price. And what is the advantage of not calling it a magazine? So my suggestion is to let things stay as they are.  Do you need to do the monster issues? Surely you can avoid them at no cost!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M.</title>
		<link>http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/comment-page-1/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of the less expensive hardbound editions.  It probably makes things simpler from the publishing side - no need to worry about softcover and hardcover binding issue.  And the hardcovers are great!

Whether it is called a &#039;magazine&#039; or &#039;quarterly anthology&#039; won&#039;t affect me much, but I like the 2-column format.  I read enough full width magazines and books.  The 2 column format is a nice change.

Just don&#039;t change away from the digest-size!  Perfect for a carry-around read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of the less expensive hardbound editions.  It probably makes things simpler from the publishing side &#8211; no need to worry about softcover and hardcover binding issue.  And the hardcovers are great!</p>
<p>Whether it is called a &#8216;magazine&#8217; or &#8216;quarterly anthology&#8217; won&#8217;t affect me much, but I like the 2-column format.  I read enough full width magazines and books.  The 2 column format is a nice change.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t change away from the digest-size!  Perfect for a carry-around read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Lacey</title>
		<link>http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/#comment-722</guid>
		<description>The switch from paperback to hardcover sounds a great idea, though being on low income I worry whether I could justify the cost once the subscription comes round for renewal. Not that the hardcover isn’t value for money, it’s just the paperback is a nice cheaper option (but that’s more my problem than yours - I should get a job that pays more!) Saying that however, considering how good Postscripts #10 looks and feels I know I&#039;d end up succumbing.  Certainly the full width layout is more appealing than the two columns. Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The switch from paperback to hardcover sounds a great idea, though being on low income I worry whether I could justify the cost once the subscription comes round for renewal. Not that the hardcover isn’t value for money, it’s just the paperback is a nice cheaper option (but that’s more my problem than yours &#8211; I should get a job that pays more!) Saying that however, considering how good Postscripts #10 looks and feels I know I&#8217;d end up succumbing.  Certainly the full width layout is more appealing than the two columns. Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughan Stanger</title>
		<link>http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughan Stanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.pspublishing.co.uk/2008/08/28/proposed-changes-to-postscripts-from-magazine-to-quarterly-anthology/#comment-357</guid>
		<description>I like the idea. Go for it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea. Go for it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
